You trust your regional bank with your hard-earned money. But are they collecting millions in overdraft fees with predatory practices that take advantage of the faith you place in them?
tELL US YOUR STORY: Contact us
Predatory Bank Overdraft Fees. If it’s happening to you, we’d like to hear your story.
Regional banks like to present themselves as small and customer-friendly. Some, though, are collecting millions of dollars in overdraft fees, often at the expense of their most vulnerable account holders.
These fees are generated through what are known as authorized-positive, settled-negative transactions. Banks automatically authorize debit card transactions, crediting the account with funds so it does not register as overdrawn. They then wait to settle the balance until the end of the day. By that time, a customer may have racked up several transactions — as well as multiple fees for having insufficient funds — without being aware that the account is overdrawn.
A single penalty may cost the owner of the account between $35-40. Often banks charge multiple penalties on a single transaction, piling fees one on top of another. This can result in significant financial damage to anyone, but most often impacts those who are surviving paycheck-to-paycheck or living within a fixed income.
This way of doing business is confusing and predatory. In return for the privilege of handling personal funds, banks promise to be trustworthy. Profiting from customers in this way is a breach of that trust.
For the past several years we’ve been collecting information on organizations that follow this practice, and we can prove that it happens far more often than many people realize. Our firm is investigating potential claims against the following, among others:
- 3Rivers Federal Credit Union
- Advantis Credit Union
- Beacon Credit Union
- BECU (Boeing Employee Credit Union)
- Busey Bank
- Crane Credit Union
- Evansville Teachers Federal Credit Union
- HAPO Community Credit Union
- Heritage Federal Credit Union
- Interra Credit Union
- InTouch Credit Union
- Knoxville TVA Employees Credit Union
- Liberty Financial
- MidWest America Federal Credit Union
- Northwest Community Credit Union (NWCU)
- OnPoint Community Credit Union
- Oregon State Credit Union
- ORNL Federal Credit Union
- Pentagon Federal Credit Union (PenFed)
- Purdue Federal Credit Union
- Rogue Credit Union
- RTN Federal Credit Union
- Y-12 Federal Credit Union
If it’s happening to you, we’d like to hear your story.
Call us toll-free at 615-254-8801 and a representative of our firm will talk with you about what’s happened. You won’t be charged for any services — and we may be able to help.
Click To Contact UsABOUT STRANCH, JENNINGS & GARVEY, PLLC
At Stranch, Jennings & Garvey, PLLC, our legal team boasts an extensive history of victorious outcomes for plaintiffs in a range of class actions, mass tort cases, and other intricate legal challenges nationwide.
In re: Darty v. Scott Credit Union, No. 19L0798 (St. Clair County, Illinois, Circuit Court, July 13, 2022). Nearly $5.6 million class action settlement representing 94% of damages after contested certification of consumer classes alleging improper assessment of overdraft and NSF fees.
In re: Jones et al. v. Lake Michigan Credit Union, No. 20-000240-CK (Washtenaw County, Michigan, Circuit Court, Oct. 12, 2022). $7.5 million class action settlement, including fee refunds and debt forgiveness, for consumers alleging assessment of improper bank fees class settlement.
In re: Stillgood Prods., LLC v. Wesbanco Bank, Inc., No. 4:21-cv-00018-SEB-DML (S.D. Indiana, Dec. 16, 2022), ECF No. 58. $6.45 million class action settlement, including refunds of bank fees challenged by consumer classes and debt forgiveness.
In re: Perkins v. Vantage Credit Union, No. 21SL-CC03736 (St. Louis County, Missouri, Circuit Court, Aug. 25, 2023). Preliminary approval of nearly $6.1 million bank fee class settlement, including changes to future fee assessment practices.
In re: Lowe et al. v. NBT Bank, No. 3:19-cv-01400-MAD-ML (N.D. New York, Sep. 30, 2022), ECF No. 104. $5.7 million bank fee class action settlement.